In the V2V and V2X-based heterogeneous vehicular networking system
the vehicles need to select the optimal network
between each network. For network selection techniques generally cant meet the random and memoryless states of the networks and vehicles
and cant predict the states transition
network optimal decision algorithm based on VMDP is proposed. The algorithm established the VMDP state space and state transition probability matrix
and used VIA to get the optimal network selection strategy. Through the performance comparison with other algorithms
the simulation results show that the algorithm can not only effectively achieve the vehicle optimal network selection
but also achieve an improvement of 10%~30% on the communication link quality and vehicular switching times. The proposed algorithm can effectively improve the performance of vehicle communication.
关键词
Keywords
references
Supraja S, Kousalya P. A comparative study by AHP and TOPSIS for the selection of all round excellence award[C]// ICEEOT 2016 - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques. IEEE, 2016: 314-319.
Sun C, Stevens-Navarro E, Wong V W S. A constrained MDP-Based vertical handoff decision algorithm for 4G wireless networks[C]// IEEE International Conference on Communications. IEEE, 2008: 2169-2174.
Yang K, Gondal I, Qiu B, et al. Combined SINR based vertical handoff algorithm for next generation heterogeneous wireless networks[C]// Global Telecommunications Conference, 2007. GLOBECOM ′07. IEEE, 2007: 4483-4487.
Zhu J, Xu L, Yang L, et al. An optimal vertical handoff decision algorithm for multiple services with different priorities in heterogeneous wireless networks[J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2015, 83(1): 1-23. DOI: 1
Chandavarkar B R, Reddy G R M. Analysis of sigmoidal utility function based handover in heterogeneous wireless networks[C]// International Conference on Microwave, Optical and Communication Engineering. IEEE, 2015: 118-121.
Wang L, Binet D. MADM-based network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks: A simulation study[C]// International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace % Electronic Systems Technology, 2009. Wireless Vitae. IEEE, 2009: 559-564.
Stevens-Navarro E, Lin Y X, Wong W S. An MDP-Based vertical handoff decision algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2008, 57(4): 1243-1254. DOI: 1243
Shen W, Zeng Q A. Cost-function-based network selection strategy in integrated wireless and mobile networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2008, 57(6): 3778-3788. DOI: 3778
Karedal J, Czink N, Paier A, et al. Path loss modeling for vehicle-to-vehicle communications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2011, 60(1): 323-328. DOI: 323
Puternam M L. Markov Decision Processes-Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming[J]. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics, 1994, 37(3): 353-353. DOI: 353
Kaiwartya O, Abdullah A H, Yue Cao, et al. Internet of vehicles: motivation, layered architecture network codel challenges and future aspects[J]. IEEE Access, 2016(4): 5356-5373. DOI: 5356
Chandrasekharamenon N P, Ancharev B. Connectivity analysis of one-dimensional vehicular ad hoc networks in fading channels[J]. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2012(1): 1. DOI: 1