When utilized traditional random forest (RF) model for classification
there were following problems exist:for example
the classification accuracy was affected by the unbalanced sample set
equality votes of each class would lead to algorithms stalling. We improved the traditional RF model
first of all
we randomly selected the same number of samples from minority class and majority class to build training sample set for RF modeling. Then
according to the voting entropy and the generalized Euclidean distance based on the sample characteristic parameters gradually add the sample with maximum voting entropy to the training sample set. This could solve the problem that in traditional RF model training samples randomly selected contained too few minority class samples. In the classification process when the voting draw occurs
we utilized the generalized Euclidean distance between the test samples and the adjacent training samples to determine the classification result
this would eliminate the stagnation caused by the equality votes of each class. The experimental results show that the optimized RF model in this paper could achieve better classification results for unbalanced data sets.
关键词
Keywords
references
Behling R, Roessner S, Kaufmann H, et al. Automated spatiotemporal landslide mapping over large areas using rapid eye time series data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2014, 6(9):8026-8055. DOI: 8026
Weiss G M.Mining with rarity:a unifying framework[J].Acm Sigkdd Explorations Newsletter, 2004, 6(1):7-19. DOI: 7
Stumpf A, Kerle N. Combining random forests and object-oriented analysis for landslide mapping from very high resolution imagery[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2011, 3(1):123-129. DOI: 123
Martha T R, Kerle N, Westen C J V, et al.Object-oriented analysis of multi-temporal panchromatic images for creation of historical landslide inventories[J].Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry % Remote Sensing, 2012, 67(2):105-119. DOI: 105
Ho T K.The random subspace method for constructing decision forests[J].IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis % Machine Intelligence, 1998, 20(8):832-844. DOI: 832