In order to ensure the optimal effect of sensor layout under uncertain conditions
this paper considers the uncertainty of nodes in the initial deployment of nodes
and adopts CVaR submodular utility maximization model to minimize the uncertainty of sensor network layout. In order to quickly and effectively obtain the optimal sensor layout under the model
the traditional greedy algorithm is improved
and the global optimal solution is searched according to the parameter τ existing in the model. At the same time
the lazy evaluation is introduced to decrease time complexity. Simulation experiments show that the CVaR model can effectively improve the robustness of the sensor deployment network when the sensor is laid out under uncertainty. Combined with the improved greedy algorithm
the layout point set can be quickly obtained with high information gain.
关键词
Keywords
references
WU W L. Application of VaR in risk management[J].Modern Commerce, 2008(35):85-86. DOI: 85
SRINIVAS N, KRAUSE A, KAKADE S M, et al. Information-theoretic regret bounds for gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2012, 58(5):3250-3265. DOI: 3250
LOU Y, HONG Y, XIE L, et al.Nash equilibrium comptetation in subnetwork Zero-Sum games with switching communication[J].IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2016, 61(10):1-15. DOI: 1
KRAUSE A, RAJAGOPAL R, GUPTA A, et al. Simultaneous optimization of sensor placements and balanced schedules[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2011, 56(10):2390-2405. DOI: 2390
XIONG H, XIE J, DENG X. Risk-averse decision making in overbooking problem[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2011(62): 1655-1665.DOI:10.1057/jors.2010.130.
WEI B G, KONG Y Y. Application status of wireless sensor networks in various fields [J]. Electronic Technology and Software Engineering, 2018(7):25. DOI: 25
TONG G, WU W, TANG S, et al. Adaptive influence maximization in dynamic social networks[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2015, 25(1):112-125. DOI: 112
GONZALEZ-LONGATT F, RUEDA J L, DOGDANOV D. Mean variance mapping optimization for the identification of gaussian mixture model: test case[C]// Efficacité énergétique - sources d'énergies renouvelablesprotectionde l'environnement COFRET'12. IEEE, 2012.
PARK H, HUTCHINSON S. Robust optimal deployment in mobile sensor networks with peer-to-peer communication[C]// IEEE International Conference on Robotics % Automation. Hong Kong, China, IEEE, 2014.
NING Y, WANG X, PAN D. VaR for Loan Portfolio in Uncertain Environment[C]// Seventh International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences % Optimization. Beijing, China, IEEE Computer Society, 2014.
PIRSIAVASH H, RAMANAN D, FOWLKES C C. Globally-optimal greedy algorithms for tracking a variable number of objects[C]//Proceedings / CVPR, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2011.
TYRRELL ROCKAFELLAR R, STANISLAV URYASEV. Optimization of conditional valueat-risk[J]. Journal of risk, 2000(2):21-42. DOI: 21
AKRAUSE, CGUESTRIN. Submodularity and its applications in optimized information gathering[J]. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2011, 2(4): 32. DOI: 32
ROCKAFELLAR R T. Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions[J]. Journal of Banking % Finance, 2002, 26(7):1443-1471. DOI: 1443