WANG Zhi-hua, ZANG Guang-kui, ZHANG Yong-bo, FU Hui-min. Comparison of two reliability models for performance degradation analysis[J]. 航空动力学报, 2015, 30(7): 1632-1637.
doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2015.07.014
WANG Zhi-hua, ZANG Guang-kui, ZHANG Yong-bo, FU Hui-min. Comparison of two reliability models for performance degradation analysis[J]. 航空动力学报, 2015, 30(7): 1632-1637.DOI: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2015.07.014.
doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2015.07.014DOI:
Comparison of two reliability models for performance degradation analysis
In order to investigate the general reliability assessment methods based on performance degradation data
two commonly used stochastic process approaches
bilinear process method and random-effect model were studied. Analyzing procedure and effectiveness of these two methodologies were studied and compared. Meanwhile
the two approaches were illustrated through practical applications. The residual plots and the 10th percentile curves of the two methods were presented to demonstrate the comparative results. The random-effect model yielded more volatile residuals and a lower and unsafe 10th percentile curve. Consequently the bilinear process model can be concluded to derive more reasonable results due to its one-stage estimation property.
Abstract
In order to investigate the general reliability assessment methods based on performance degradation data
two commonly used stochastic process approaches
bilinear process method and random-effect model were studied. Analyzing procedure and effectiveness of these two methodologies were studied and compared. Meanwhile
the two approaches were illustrated through practical applications. The residual plots and the 10th percentile curves of the two methods were presented to demonstrate the comparative results. The random-effect model yielded more volatile residuals and a lower and unsafe 10th percentile curve. Consequently the bilinear process model can be concluded to derive more reasonable results due to its one-stage estimation property.