1. 中北大学 机构 软件学院,山西,太原,030051
2. 山西省信息产业技术研究院有限公司,山西,太原,030051
3. 中北大学 信息与通信工程学院,山西,太原,030051
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
李众, 白瑞君, 洪军, 李亚伦, 王高, 杨剑. 基于自适应特征融合及多尺度输出的遥感图像飞机检测算法[J]. 微电子学与计算机, 2021, 38(4): 40-45, 51.
LI Zhong, BAI Rui-jun, HONG Jun, et al. Aircraft detection algorithm of remote sensing image based on adaptive feature fusion and multi-scale output[J]. 2021, 38(4): 40-45.
针对当前YOLOv3算法在遥感图像中复杂场景飞机漏检、误检等问题,提出一种基于自适应特征融合及多尺度输出的遥感图像飞机检测算法.该算法首先使用K-means++代替K-means算法对数据集进行聚类,解决了K-means初始聚类中心不稳定性;然后,在YOLOv3网络基础上增加了一个含有分辨率信息的尺度,更有利于检测小目标飞机;最后,在网络模型四尺度输出前增加了自适应特征融合层,解决了不同尺度的特征融合不充分以及减少或消除反向传导受到负样本的影响.实验结果表明,改进的YOLOv3算法在遥感图像上飞机检测精度达到96.17%,比YOLOv3算法精度提高了2.6%.
In view of the problems such as missing detection and false detection of complex scene aircraft in remote sensing image by the YOLOv3 algorithm
an aircraft detection algorithm based on adaptive feature fusion and multiscale output is proposed. Firstly
K-means ++ is used to cluster the data set instead of K-means algorithm
which solves the instability of the initial clustering center of k-means. Then
on the basis of YOLOv3 network
a scale with resolution information is added
which is more conducive to the detection of small target aircraft. Finally
an adaptive feature fusion layer is added before the four scale output of the network model
which solves the problem of insufficient feature fusion at different scales and reduces or eliminates the influence of negative samples on reverse conduction. The experimental results show that the detection accuracy of the improved algorithm reaches 96.17% in the remote sensing image
which is 2.6% higher than that of the algorithm.
曹家梓, 宋爱国. 基于马尔科夫随机场的纹理图像分割方法研究[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2015, 36(4): 776-786. DOI:10.19650/j.cnki.cjsi.2015.04.008. CAO J Z, SONG A G. Research on the texture image segmentation method based on Markov random field[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2015, 36(4): 776-786. DOI: 10.19650/j.cnki.cjsi.2015.04.008.
CHEN Z, ZHANG T, OUYANG C. End-to-end airplane detection using transfer learning in remote sensing images[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(1): 139. DOI: 10.3390/rs10010 139.
CHENG G, ZHOU P C, HAN J W. Learning rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for object detection in VHR optical remote sensing images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(12): 7405-7415. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2601622.
YANG X, SUN H, FU K, et al. Automatic ship detection in remote sensing images from Google earth of complex scenes based on multiscale rotation dense feature pyramid networks[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(1): 132. DOI: 10.3390/rs10010 132.
HE K M, ZHANG X Y, REN S Q, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Las Vegas: IEEE, 2016: 770-778. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.
王思雨, 高鑫, 孙皓, 等. 基于卷积神经网络的高分辨率SAR图像飞机目标检测方法[J]. 雷达学报, 2017, 6(2): 195-203. DOI: 10.12000/JR17009. WANG S Y, GAO X, SUN H, et al. An aircraft detection method based on convolutional neural networks in high-resolution SAR images[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(2): 195-203. DOI: 10.12000/JR17009.
王广学, 黄晓涛, 周智敏. 基于邻域统计分布变化分析的UWB SAR隐蔽目标变化检测[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2011, 33(1): 49-54. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2010.00202. WANG G X, HUANG X T, ZHOU Z M. UWBSAR change detection of target in foliage based on local statistic distribution change analysis[J]. Journal of Electronics % Information Technology, 2011, 33(1): 49-54. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2010.00202.
王金传, 谭喜成, 王召海, 等. 基于Faster R-CNN深度网络的遥感影像目标识别方法研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(10): 1500-1508. DOI: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.180237. WANG J C, TAN X C, WANG Z H, et al. Faster R-CNN deep learning network based object recognition of remote sensing image[J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2018, 20(10): 1500-1508. DOI: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.180237.
REDMON J, FARHADI A. YOLO9000: better, faster, stronger[C]//Proceedings of the2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Honolulu: IEEE, 2017: 6517-6525. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.690.
0
浏览量
61
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010602201714号