1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海,200092
2. 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室(同济大学),上海,200092
赵春风(1964—),男,教授,博士生导师
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
赵春风, 费逸, 赵程, 等. 无黏性土中钻孔径向卸荷收缩理论解[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2020,52(4):135-141.
ZHAO Chunfeng, FEI Yi, ZHAO Cheng, et al. Analytical solution for borehole contraction caused by radial unloading in cohesiveless soil[J]. 2020, 52(4): 135-141.
赵春风, 费逸, 赵程, 等. 无黏性土中钻孔径向卸荷收缩理论解[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2020,52(4):135-141. DOI: 10.11918/201901026.
ZHAO Chunfeng, FEI Yi, ZHAO Cheng, et al. Analytical solution for borehole contraction caused by radial unloading in cohesiveless soil[J]. 2020, 52(4): 135-141. DOI: 10.11918/201901026.
在钻孔灌注桩成孔过程中会引起钻孔周边土体径向应力卸载和钻孔收缩变形
为此
基于SMP屈服准则和非相关联流动法则
推导在无黏性土中竖向钻孔径向卸荷孔周应力场位移场解析解
并结合Berezantsev和夹心墙两种土压力公式
得出孔周孔壁位移沿钻孔深度方向的变化曲线
并与忽略塑性区弹性变形的结果进行对比.参数分析的结果表明
卸荷因子n和钻孔半径a0及内摩擦角对孔壁位移均有明显影响
其中n和的影响存在着临界点
n和小于该值
孔壁位移则显著增大;而剪胀角ψ 的影响有限
可忽略不计.卸荷因子n是一个只与内摩擦角有关的函数;而rp/a是一个只与、n有关的定值
与深度方向无关
故无黏性土中竖向钻孔的自立深度为0.忽略塑性区弹性变形的柱孔收缩位移解相对偏小
而塑性区半径解相对偏大
故忽略塑性区弹性变形的解答在工程应用中不保守.另外
选取不同土压力沿深度方向的孔壁位移值存在较大差别
在竖向钻孔时的土压力选取还需与现场实测相结合.
The drilling process of a bored pile can cause radial unloading-induced borehole contraction. In this study
the stress-displacement solution for a borehole under radial unloading in cohesiveless soil was derived based on the SMP yield criterion and the non-associated flow rule. By combining with earth pressure formulas derived from cavity wall formula and Berezantsev’s formula
the variation curves of borehole wall displacement with borehole depth were obtained
which were compared the results of the case with elastic deformation ignored in plastic zone. Parameters study shows that the unloading factor n
borehole radius a0
and internal friction angle had obvious influences on borehole wall displacement
and the effects of n and had a critical value where the borehole wall displacement was significantly increased when n and were less than the value. However
the influence of dilatancy angle ψ on borehole wall displacement was limited and could be ignored. In addition
n was a function only related to
while rp/a was a constant value only related to n and and had no relation with depth
which suggests that the self-supported depth of vertical drilling in cohesiveless soil was zero. Moreover
it can be found that the wall displacement was smaller and the plastic zone radius was larger when elastic deformation was ignored in plastic zone
which indicates that the solution of ignoring elastic deformation in plastic zone is not conservative in engineering applications. Lastly
the value of borehole wall displacement with different earth pressures along depth was quite different
which shows that the selection of earth pressure in vertical drilling should be combined with real field measurement.
0
浏览量
142
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010602201714号