1. 重庆交通大学 机构 航空学院,重庆,400074
2. 重庆交通大学 绿色航空技术研究院,重庆,401120
[ "陈博涵,硕士研究生," ]
[ "邵垒,讲师,硕士生导师," ]
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
陈博涵, 邵垒, 贺佳伟, 等. 单、双腔缓冲器落震动力学特性对比[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2025,44(6):1090-1096.
陈博涵, 邵垒, 贺佳伟, et al. Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics of Single and Double Cavity Buffers[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2025, 44(6): 1090-1096.
陈博涵, 邵垒, 贺佳伟, 等. 单、双腔缓冲器落震动力学特性对比[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2025,44(6):1090-1096. DOI: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.20230247.
陈博涵, 邵垒, 贺佳伟, et al. Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics of Single and Double Cavity Buffers[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2025, 44(6): 1090-1096. DOI: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.20230247.
为了评估单、双腔缓冲器在起落架落震动力学特性的差异,本文基于非线性多体动力学系统模型,采用LMS Motion动力系统仿真软件建立了单、双腔缓冲器数学仿真模型,在充分验证仿真模型有效性的基础上,针对缓冲器轴向力载荷、压缩行程和航向摩擦等落震动力学特性进行了量化对比。研究结果表明:双腔式缓冲器相较于单腔式承受载荷后峰减少了53 kN,降低了约15.9%,可有效减少飞机在着陆期间的颠簸状况;与单腔缓冲器相比,双腔式缓冲器波峰间隔时间增加了0.1 s,提升了约10.3%,提升了乘客在飞机着陆时的舒适度;双腔式缓冲器相较于单腔式产生的航向摩擦力做功减少了5 kJ,降低了约7%,能在一定情况下减少轮胎在飞机降落时的磨损情况;双腔式缓冲器的缓冲器压缩行程相较于单腔式增加了22.1 mm,提升了约7%,双腔式缓冲器行程要求更高;双腔式缓冲器较单腔式缓冲器相比缓冲器吸能效率有一定的降低。
In order to evaluate the difference of dynamic characteristics of single-cavity buffer and double-cavity buffer on landing gear
based on the model of non-linear multi-body dynamic system
mathematical simulation models of single-cavity buffer and double-cavity buffer were established with using LMS Motion dynamic system simulation software. On the basis of fully verifying the validity of simulation models
the dynamic characteristics of shock such as axial force load
compression travel and heading friction of the buffers were quantitatively compared. The results show that the double-cavity buffer reduces 53 kN and 15.9% of post-load peak compared with the single-cavity buffer
which can effectively reduce the jerk condition during landing. Compared with single-cavity buffer
double-cavity buffer increases the peak interval time by 0.1 s or about 10.3%
and improves the comfort of passengers on landing. The work done by the double-chamber buffer on the course friction force produced by the single-chamber buffer is reduced by 5 kJ and about 7% compared with that produced by the single-chamber buffer
which can reduce the wear of the tires on landing of the aircraft under certain circumstances. The compression stroke of double-chamber buffer is 22.1 mm higher than that of single-chamber buffer
about 7% higher
and the stroke requirement of double-chamber buffer is higher. The energy absorption efficiency of double-cavity buffer is lower than that of single-cavity buffer.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010602201714号